.tHE .sIRIUS .cYBERNETICS .cORPORATION
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW MANY MAGAZINES CAN THE ATARI SCENE STAND?!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A strange topic, isn't it? Of course our scene could stand a lot of magazines
that have their main topic in the Atari scene or better Atari demo scene. So the
question maybe should be: "How many magazines can be supported by the nowadays
Atari scene?!" This article isn't thought to mourn about the things or something
but only my, an editor's, view onto the things...
Before we start to take a closer look onto the things, let's have a small excurs
into the near past... As you know, the Atari scene had always a quite regular
magazine posse, releasing magazines like DBA Mag, Maggie, Toxic Mag and last but
not least UCM, just to count the most memorable names of the last years. New
magazines popped up here and there, just like Eye On Scene, but since we had a
hard regular staff of magazines, their chances weren't the best for a real
breakthrough. And the reason is quite simple, since the existing "big" magazines
had already bound a big ammount of writers and new writers mostly wanted to
support one of those big magazines instead of the newbies and maybe even the
guys behind those newbie magazines didn't had enough energy to fight themselves
through the first hard years.
Things started to change 3 years ago, as I decided to stop my editors job at the
UCM, that was grown from some german lamer magazine since 1993 to one (and I
think it finally was the number one) of the leading Atari scene magazines. I had
given up the editor ship to STsurvivor, who was an very active UCM writer at
that time, and he kicked his editorship for the Toxic Magazine. Around the same
time the Reservoir Gods stopped their big support for Maggie.
As you can see, the whole, in the former years very stable, Atari diskmag scene
started to change, but in a way that wasn't good finally. Only one year later
the crisis reached its peak. Toxic Mag died as diskmagazine, was changed to an
online magazine that is starving to death atm.
Maggie itself was starving as well after the Reservoir Gods left its lines and
since STsurvivor wasn't satisfied with UCM he decided to stop with UCM. At the
same time I thought about creating a new magazine in the underground, the old
...inSTabil... project, you know.
But you know the story... in the middle of 2ooo all former Atari diskmags were
vanished from the screen and the few surviving writers formed a team to save at
least one magazine for the scene, Alive. The Alive team was gathering writers
from Maggie and the UCM staff and had big chances to stand in that position for
some more years. But the scene lost the needed diversity and since I knewed that
it is hard to come with some new magazine, esp. in such hard times, I decided to
take over the UCM again, to give the scene some colours back again.
As I know many people weren't satisfied with the point that Alive should be the
only magazine and because of this reason another magazine, done by another one
who wrote mainly for UCM in the past, Grey, was released, CHOSNECK.
But both, the new CHOSNECK and the reanimated UCM had one big problem. Since the
ALIVE magazine was for longer time the only Atari scene publication, it didn't
only merged some hardcore editors, nope, also some others joined them, even if
they didn't joined the team at all. And since CHOSNECK was a new creation and
UCM lost the most old writers to the Alive staff, both had troubles to find some
new writers and the result is up to day that CHOSNECK didn't matched it to speed
up the release dates, even if Grey matched it to form a new magazine staff for
the magazine. Much harder it is for UCM since only a very few people supported
it really, even if a lot of people told me they liked the UCM back and would
help us out... So while CHOSNECK already has his own writers staff now, the UCM
don't has still and the main work is still sticking like tar on my hands alone.
I have to admit that I don't have something against the fact to do the mainwork,
but it breaks down the motivation and the chance to survive for UCM, since only
one issue per year is shit. I'm happy that at least the parts of the grafix and
musix isn't that problem anymore since the todays Atari scene is much faster in
helping out, but as said it doesn't makes sense to create something like a mag
alone. It will lay in the line of fire of the critics forever.
And so I came to the idea for this article. The feedback I got for UCM 21, all
the discussions held before and after the release, as well as the feedback to
CHOSNECK, showed up that it isn't time to create only one magazine for the Atari
demoscene up to now. The scene really wants more and furthermore needs more, to
show how different the views in that small scene are. Only one magazine would
present only one point of view and since this scene is a gathering of many very
different thinking people, it will never have the chance to satisfy all the
minds in the scene.
But there is laying the problem. Even if many people would like to have other
magazines, give you positive feedback for your encourage to create something
different besides the existing ones it is some kind of impossible to find new
writers for the new magazine. I really don't know the reason. As the movements
of the nowadays Atari scene are showing, it is still a melting pot of many, many
skilled people that want to hold up the Atari flag in any way.
And even if all people want to read more stuff about this scene in diskmagazines
nearly nobody wants to write for such a magazine. And so the question is not,
"Needs this scene more magazines?"... nope, it's just "Is this scene able to
support more magazines at all?" and I have a bad feeling in my stomach if it
goes to answer that question.
Even if this scene needs diversity, it seems not to be able to support divers
views aka magazines. Ok, maybe it can support them, but not in the way those
magazines need, or maybe it doesn't want to support them at all?!
Maybe the reason is quite simple? Maybe all wants to read something but nobody
wants to write because of the possible reactions?! That could be a reason, since
the DHS bulletin board as well as feedbacks and discussion on IRC that the scene
is very aggressive nowadays. It is still very friendly, but only as long as no
one says the things he doesn't like. Is this the reason?!
I really don't know, but it's a point to think more about. As the mentioned
things above, the negative feedback, flaming discussion and active boycotts, are
showing, are the nerves of the todays Atari scene laying blank. But why?
We are a shrinking and maybe soon dying species. This brings the surviving freax
closer and closer together, maybe too close. And while it was in former times a
damn big community where you never had the possibilities to check your contacts
out as much as today since they were just too many, the getting closer of today
maybe shows that the people you always liked and thought they were on the same
trip, are much more different, and in some points too different from your own
views, that brings you to a point to ask about the sense of the relation with
them. And this seems to be a point. Some people can stand different views and
meanings while others can't.
Furthermore a strange way of thinking has started. Many people today thinking
they're heroes on Atari, that their moves and views are the only right ones. And
too much heroes aren't good since if several people think they're doing the only
right things, the conflict is already laying in the air. And some more... only
to write or say that you don't like something another freak has done, doesn't
means that you don't like him as well... but that's a point many people can't
anymore, and I have to admit, that I also have again and again such breaks in my
mind. I know that it is very important to identify yourself with the things you
have done, but there must be a frontier somewhere. And this frontier is lacked
by many people today...
And while many people are too much identifying themselves with the things they
have done, others don't stand to their views, they just say them but they don't
want to offer them to a wider public because they already know the reactions of
the other people... and since the current Atari scene related magazines bringing
us mostly articles about the moves of the scene as well as about scene prods, it
is a hot job to write articles in that surroundings of fanatism and dishonesty
and even if the people would like to write down their thoughts they are in fear
of flames and fuckings. Or am I wrong here?
As said, I'm just thinking about the problem to find writers for a magazine
today and my thoughts in here aren't meant to be the complete truth or something
like that, just some ideas I had as I thought about it.
My views mentioned at last seem to be confirmed by the reactions I got again and
again for my thoughts released in UCM. But it has something to do with the right
of free speech or is the todays Atari scene really that intolerant? And I will
go on in my style as long as I got mails and reactions of people that tell me,
that I have to say the truth... And if I would praise a demo that is shit in
reality, just to avoid some flamings by its makers, I would be a damn liar!
And those liars are destroying the scene, since only the point that I say that I
don't like the one or other production, doesn't mean that I hate the creators of
it as well...
So just think about those lines and maybe you will find the encourage then to
join the guilde of magazine writers, to help to give the Atari magazine scene
some more colours and to help to save it's current diversity...
Any opinions about that topic? Mail me: moondog@atari.org
.tSCc. moondog . o3/2k2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|